Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lamb et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Lamb, Matthew C Lay, Eric D Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, George Theron Bynum and Jack Blair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Huddleston v. John Christner Trucking, LLC
as 4:2017cv00549
Plaintiff:
Thomas Huddleston, Ryan Cooper, James Murphy and others
Defendant:
John Christner Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Milinichik v. Halcon Resources Corp. et al
as 4:2014cv00101
Plaintiff:
Stephen Milinichik
Defendant:
Halcon Resources Corp. and Jim Stubbs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Price et al v. Public Service Company of Oklahoma
as 4:2013cv00514
Plaintiff:
Steve A Price , Bobby L Erwin , John Harn and others
Defendant:
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Mantooth v. AT&T, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00261
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mantooth
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Piccolo et al v. Techsico, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00244
Plaintiff:
Stephen Piccolo , Alan Downing , Christopher Mathis and others
Defendant:
Techsico, LLC, Techsico Enterprise Solutions, Inc., Techsico Carrier Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bergstresser et al v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc.
as 4:2007cv00046
Plaintiff:
Darryl Bergstresser, Darryl Bergstresser, Darryl Bergstresser and others
Defendant:
Accredited Home Lenders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Retirement Plans Committee v. Stephens et al
as 4:2007cv00025
Plaintiff:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Retirement Plans Committee, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Retirement Plans Committee and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Retirement Plans Committee
Defendant:
David Stephens, Johnny Stephens and Orville Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
