Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Taylor v. Tulsa Welding School et al
as 4:2014cv00321
Plaintiff:
Terry N Taylor
Defendant:
Tulsa Welding School, University of Tulsa Hospital, Winnebago County States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillard v. Judge Welch et al
as 4:2014cv00186
Plaintiff:
Frank Dillard, Jr
Defendant:
Judge Welch and Latimer Co District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Tulsa Welding School et al
as 4:2014cv00047
Plaintiff:
Terry N Taylor
Defendant:
Tulsa Welding School, University of Tulsa Hospital, Winnebago Co. States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Eagan
as 4:2013cv00752
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Harris
Defendant:
Judge Eagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Tulsa Welding School et al
as 4:2013cv00569
Plaintiff:
Terry N Taylor
Defendant:
Tulsa Welding School, University of Tulsa Hospital, Winnebago Co and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. District Attorney Tim Harris et al
as 4:2013cv00211
Plaintiff:
Matthew Luke Wallace
Defendant:
District Attorney Tim Harris, Department of Corrections, State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Creek County District Judge et al
as 4:2012cv00288
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Allen
Defendant:
Creek County District Judge, Creek County District Court Clerk and Creek County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Vann v. Wieneke et al
as 4:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Tony L Vann
Defendant:
Dennis L Wieneke, Peggy L Wieneke, Randle Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooks v. Glanz et al
as 4:2008cv00604
Plaintiff:
Andre E Hooks
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz and Judge Ottey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carney v. Peters et al
as 4:2008cv00154
Plaintiff:
Franny Carney
Defendant:
Kevin L Peters, R G Fry, Trisha Archer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
