Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Hughes et al v. Pierce et al
as 4:2014cv00224
Plaintiff:
Stanford Gene Hughes and Cheryl Hughes
Defendant:
Robert Eugene Pierce, Federal Express Corp. , Protective Insurance Co. and others
Intervenor:
CompSource Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. Mansur
as 4:2011cv00446
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defendant:
Jason Rex Mansur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Millikin v. Tulsa, City of et al
as 4:2010cv00314
Plaintiff:
Wesley Millikin
Defendant:
Tulsa, City of and Donald B Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. Whitney et al
as 4:2009cv00078
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defendant:
Pamela Whitney, Pamela Whitney, Pamela Whitney and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jain v. SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P. et al
as 4:2008cv00738
Plaintiff:
Dharam V Jain, Dharam V Jain, Dharam V Jain and others
Defendant:
SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P., SemGroup Energy Partners G. P., LLC, SemGroup Energy Partners G. P., LLC and others
Movant:
Michael Rubin, Michael Rubin, Michael Rubin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hickman v. SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P. et al
as 4:2008cv00737
Plaintiff:
William L Hickman and William L Hickman
Defendant:
SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P., SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P., SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P. and others
Movant:
Michael Rubin, Michael Rubin and Michael Rubin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Raith et al v. Mayes County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 4:2007cv00097
Plaintiff:
Ginny Raith, Ginny Raith, Ann-Marie Pierce and others
Defendant:
Mayes County Board of County Commissioners, Mayes County Board of County Commissioners and Frank Cantey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
