Cases 51 - 60 of 125
Williams v. Tulsa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2017cv00271
Petitioner:
John Edgar Williams, III
Respondent:
Tulsa County Sheriff's Office and Kathleen Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabelt v. Krewson et al
as 4:2017cv00213
Plaintiff:
Garrett Davis Gabelt
Defendant:
Jesse Krewson and Sheriff Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Reed et al
as 4:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
Richard A Smith
Defendant:
Mike Reed, Mitch Goodman, Mayes County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagnell v. Floyd et al
as 4:2017cv00049
Plaintiff:
Nathan Daniel Bagnell
Defendant:
Sheriff Floyd and Theresa Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cessor v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County et al
as 4:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
Joshawa Cessor
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, Correctional Healthcare Management of Oklahoma, Inc., Tulsa County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Tulsa County Sheriff's Office
as 4:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Edgar Williams, III
Defendant:
Tulsa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coday v. Key et al
as 4:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
John Coday
Defendant:
Pat Key , Tulsa County Clerk , Steve Kunzweiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Winfield et al
as 4:2016cv00734
Plaintiff:
Jonel Lewis
Defendant:
Detention Officer Winfield, Detention Officer Anderson and Tulsa County Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguirre v. Deputy Sheriff Cherry et al
as 4:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
Rodney Mark Aguirre
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Cherry and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Glanz et al
as 4:2016cv00349
Plaintiff:
Destiny Holland
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz , Sheriff of Tulsa County, The , Tulsa County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.