Cases 61 - 70 of 85
Anderson v. Standifird
as 4:2011cv00265
Petitioner:
Raymond G Anderson
Respondent:
Jane Standifird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DTG Operations, Inc. et al v. U Ride II, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00279
Plaintiff:
DTG Operations, Inc. , Thrifty Rent-A-Car System, Inc. and Dollar Rent A Car, Inc.
Defendant:
U Ride II, LLC and David Anderson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Anderson et al v. Arrow Trucking Co. et al
as 4:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Mark Anderson, Trish Boone, Sharon Celli and others
Defendant:
Arrow Trucking Co., Douglas Pielsticker and Carol Pielsticker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Fields v. Rayl et al
as 4:2009cv00800
Plaintiff:
James Fields, Jr
Defendant:
James Brian Rayl, Pete Silva, Tulsa Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Oklahoma, State of
as 4:2009cv00776
Petitioner:
Douglas Christopher Anderson
Respondent:
Oklahoma, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
United States of America v. Anderson
as 4:2009mc00030
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Travis K Anderson
Dicus v. A.T.S. Specialized et al
as 4:2009cv00542
Plaintiff:
Patsy Dicus and Patsy Dicus
Defendant:
A.T.S. Specialized, A.T.S. Specialized, Anderson Trucking Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
