Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Cases 81 - 90 of 377
Owens v. Osage Casino
as 4:2017cv00239
Plaintiff: Anthony E Owens
Defendant: Osage Casino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00227
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc.
as 4:2017mc00008
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: AMG Services, Inc., Red Cedar Services, Inc., SFS, Inc. and others
Wilson v. University Mansion Limited Partnership et al
as 4:2017cv00217
Plaintiff: Wilma Wilson
Defendant: University Mansion Limited Partnership , Stephen E Holzel and Horizon Realty Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrisett v. USA
as 4:2017cv00157
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Jimmy E Morrisett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Olagues v. Muncrief et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00153
Plaintiff: John Olagues
Defendant: Richard E Muncrief, Dennis Cameron and WPX Energy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lolar v. State of Oklahoma, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00138
Plaintiff: Marcus E Lolar
Defendant: State of Oklahoma, The and Mike Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lolar v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2017cv00135
Plaintiff: Marcus E Lolar
Defendant: State of Oklahoma, The, William McDaniel and Kevin Jeffries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lolar v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2017cv00137
Plaintiff: Marcus E Lolar
Defendant: State of Oklahoma, The and Bruce David Gambill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lolar v. State of Oklahoma, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00139
Plaintiff: Marcus E Lolar
Defendant: State of Oklahoma, The and Burl Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?