Cases 1 - 10 of 377
Gunzenheiser v. Konopa
as 4:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Jon E Gunzenheiser
Defendant:
Robert J Konopa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Heavener v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
John E Heavener
Defendant:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrapin v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Ruth E Terrapin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Coburn v. Kirbo et al
as 4:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Carissa Marie Coburn
Defendant:
Krystal Kirbo, Key Renters, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Markham v. Russell et al
as 4:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Stephen Markham
Defendant:
Joseph E Russell, Jr, Debra L Russell, Known Heirs Joseph E Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lolar v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00269
Petitioner:
Marcus E Lolar
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poe et al v. Drummond et al
as 4:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Peter Poe, Paula Poe, Patrick Poe and others
Defendant:
Gentner Drummond, Steven Katsis, Trevor Nutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephens et al v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Linh Stephens and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Rodney Sparkman, April Seibert, James Hubert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sweet et al v. Dean et al
as 4:2022cv00442
Plaintiff:
Alexander Nicholaus Sweet and Morgan L Caldwell
Defendant:
Brian S Dean and Douglas E Snow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
