Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Wiland v. Stitt et al
as 4:2024cv00443
Defendant:
Wilma Palmer, Julie Doss, Gentner Drummond and others
Plaintiff:
Bri'Anne Wiland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kolmer et al
as 4:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kolmer and Julie Kolmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
JulieKay, Inc. et al v. Nars Cosmetics, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
JulieKay, Inc. and Julie Kay Kyles
Defendant:
Nars Cosmetics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Williams v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Julie Williams
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC d/b/a Dollar General doing business as Dollar General and Dolgencorp, LLC doing business as Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Ronald G Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
July v. Dowling
as 4:2022cv00393
Petitioner:
George Emile July
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United Sates of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Burke v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Michele D Burke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, G T Bynum, Mark Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis et al v. Kerr et al
as 4:2021cv00270
Defendant:
Julie Kerr, Accelroute LLC, Dash Logistics LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Spencer Mathis and Jadan Fenstermaker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
