Cases 1 - 10 of 55
King v. Tjeerdsma et al
as 4:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Ra'Terrius King
Defendant:
John Tjeerdsma, Jeffery Gatwood, Tulsa County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene King
Defendant:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. State of Oklahoma DOC et al
as 4:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Noel King, Sonny Moore, Reginald Anderson and others
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma DOC, Derrick Yazel, Jason Lemons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Bales et al
as 4:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
Great Lakes Insurance SE and Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) PLC
Defendant:
Jim Bales an individual doing business as King Point Resort and Lenda Anderson-Bales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
King v. Kunzweiler et al
as 4:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Dwayne King and Dewayne King
Defendant:
Steve Kunzweiler, Savannah Titus, Chad Moyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Kennedy
as 4:2020cv00505
Defendant:
Curtis Kennedy
Plaintiff:
Tristan King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCormick et al v. Barr et al
as 4:2020cv00024
Plaintiff:
Paul Leroy Wickham and Jennifer Leann McCormick
Defendant:
Oklahoma Bar Association, Christopher Wray, William Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. USA
as 4:2019cv00712
Petitioner:
Robert Patrick King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reeves v. Enterprise Products Partners, LP
as 4:2019cv00570
Plaintiff:
Darrell Reeves and James King
Defendant:
Enterprise Products Partners, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
