Cases 1 - 10 of 13
White et al v. Li et al
as 4:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Gregory White and Nevada Tate
Defendant:
Haoyong Li, Double Z Trucking, Inc. and MS Transverse Insurance Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Tate et al v. City of Bartlesville et al
as 4:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Tate, Garry W Richardson and Kelly R Dickey
Defendant:
City of Bartlesville, Neighborhood Services Code Enforcement, Mila Wickham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tate v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2020cv00627
Plaintiff:
Neil Erving Tate
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00457
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lolar v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2017cv00136
Plaintiff:
Marcus E Lolar
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, The, Stuart L Tate and Mike Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate-Sullivan v. USA
as 4:2016cv00446
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Corrigan Kenneth Theodor Tate-Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tate v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
James W Tate
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tate v. David L. Moss Corr. Ctr. et al
as 4:2014cv00686
Plaintiff:
Carl J Tate
Defendant:
David L. Moss Corr. Ctr. and Armor Corr. Health Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2013cv00400
Plaintiff:
Opie Wray Tate
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Empire Bank v. Dumond et al
as 4:2013cv00388
Plaintiff:
Empire Bank
Defendant:
Bill J Dumond, Rebecca J Dumond, B & B Real Estate, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
