Cases 1 - 10 of 6,356
Shepard v. Quick et al
as 5:2024cv00578
Petitioner:
Byron James Shepard
Respondent:
Christe Quick and Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jones v. Stephens County Jail
as 5:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Dominic R Jones
Defendant:
Stephens County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent:
William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christensen et al v. Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
John Christensen and Andrew Linton Sawyers
Defendant:
Chris Anderson, Under Sheriff and Cleveland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liles v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00563
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Dylan Michael Liles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hudson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00561
Petitioner:
Roy Hudson
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Liu v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00571
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Shaorong Liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Thompson v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00557
Petitioner:
Dewayne Antwon Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Randle-Giles v. Comanche County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Edgar Royce Randle-Giles
Defendant:
Comanche County Jail and LARC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spears v. Nganga et al
as 5:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Brandon L Spears
Defendant:
Ginette Nganga and FNU Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
