Cases 171 - 180 of 27,967
Purdy v. Harpe
as 5:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Aaron C Purdy
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zone Mechanical North LLC v. Ruther et al
as 5:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Zone Mechanical North LLC
Defendant:
Alex Ruther and Alex Ruther doing business as Jackbe Inc
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 1463 Public Contracts: Unlawful Employment Prac
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garcia v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00341
Petitioner:
Harry Garcia
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cricket Film LLC v. Duffy
as 5:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Cricket Film LLC
Defendant:
Tameson Duffy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Stephens et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 5:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Stephens and Gil Cody Wilson
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Fox v. Loman et al
as 5:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Kaci Fox
Defendant:
David Loman and Board of County Commissioners of the County of Canadian County, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spalding v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00337
Petitioner:
David L Spalding
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McDonald v. Lilly et al
as 5:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Alexis McDonald, Jr
Defendant:
Amanda Lilly, Garfield County Detention Center and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAC Trailer Sales Inc v. United States Department of Labor
as 5:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
MAC Trailer Sales Inc
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
