Cases 51 - 60 of 1,552
Horton v. Tayloe et al
as 5:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Donald Emmitt Tayloe, Michael Charles Flanagan, Gerald Frank Neuwirth and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rees et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 5:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rees and Diedra Rees
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and John W Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Doe v. Integris Health Inc
as 5:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Integris Health Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gosselin v. Jones
as 5:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Marcel John Gosselin
Defendant:
Michael A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WBL SPO I LLC v. Revelation Trucking LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
WBL SPO I LLC
Defendant:
Revelation Trucking LLC, Olivia Madissen Roblez, Charles Gloria and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Abdo v. OKC Parole Office et al
as 5:2023cv00725
Petitioner:
John Abdo, Jr
Respondent:
OKC Parole Office and Charles Mix County South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abdo v. Grady County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
John Abdo, Jr
Defendant:
Grady County Jail and Food Services and Tiger Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdo v. Oklahoma City Parole Office et al
as 5:2023cv00719
Plaintiff:
John Abdo, Jr
Defendant:
Oklahoma City Parole Office and J Pleasant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AKG v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
AKG, Austin Gunter, Aaron Vanbuskirk and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, John Canavan, Tracy McDaniel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
