Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Walden v. The City of Duncan, Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01075
Plaintiff:
Shawn Walden
Defendant:
The City of Duncan, Oklahoma and Christian Archer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Coplen v. Stephens County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
Norman Coplen
Defendant:
Stephens County Jail, Duncan Police Department, Michael Elroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Stephens County Sheriff et al
as 5:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Juan Demetrius Hill and Juan-D Hill
Defendant:
Stephens County Sheriff, Oklahoma Attorney General, Govenor Kevin Stitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neill et al v. Hyundai Motor America
as 5:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Erin Duncan O'Neill and Robert Eugene Craig III
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Duncan v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv00536
Petitioner:
Jackie Duncan
Respondent:
FNU Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirk v. Duncan OK City of et al
as 5:2021cv00259
Defendant:
Veterans Administration, Trinidad CO Police Department, Lawton OK City of and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Josiah Kirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan Ticking Inc v. Duncan et al
as 5:2021cv00162
Defendant:
Universal Sleep Product Inc and Timothy Stuart Edward Duncan
Plaintiff:
Duncan Ticking Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Duncan v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv01050
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jackie Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
