Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Loggins v. Bowling et al
as 5:2021cv00236
Defendant:
Insurance Providers for Defendants, Oklahoma Bar Association, Crone and Dunlevy and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Loggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowles v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2017cv01136
Plaintiff:
Charles Bowles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Simmons et al v. Oklahoma Heart Hospital LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00607
Plaintiff:
Brenda Simmons , Tuesdae Bowling , Kimberly McKinzie and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma Heart Hospital LLC and OHH Physicians LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Reese v. Miller et al
as 5:2016cv00608
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lamont Reese
Defendant:
Lennis Miller, Nyles Parton and Benny Bowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Miller et al
as 5:2016cv00580
Plaintiff:
Gerald Todd Bennett, Jr
Defendant:
Lennis Miller, Nyles Parton and Benny Bowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briggs et al v. Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc et al
as 5:2013cv01157
Plaintiff:
Helen Briggs , Sonya Alexander , Sergio Arteaga and others
Defendant:
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc, Freeport-McMoran Corporation, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Tiessen v. AMF Bowling Centers Inc
as 5:2012cv00320
Plaintiff:
Charles R Tiessen
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowling v. Whetsel et al
as 5:2008cv00719
Plaintiff:
Bill Murry Bowling, III
Defendant:
John Whetsel, Don Garrison, Ron Osterhaut and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bowling et al v. ConAgra Foods Inc
as 5:2008cv00412
Plaintiff:
Daisy Bowling and Clifton Bowling
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
