Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Gravlee v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
John Christian Gravlee
Defendant:
FNU Tibbs, FNU Prince, FNU Kala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawford v. Lawson et al
as 5:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Bernard Crawford
Defendant:
Regina Lawson, Steven Bickley, T Hastings Siegfried and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rodriguez v. Goldey et al
as 5:2022cv00921
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Rodriguez
Defendant:
Warden Goldey, Associate Warden Michelli, Captain Bouche and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stouffer v. Crow et al
as 5:2021cv01000
Plaintiff:
Bigler Jobe Stouffer, II and Bigler Jobe Stouffer
Defendant:
Scott Crow, Randy Chandler, Betty R Gesell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv00342
Petitioner:
Alfred James Prince
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. Probation and Community et al
as 5:2018cv01187
Plaintiff:
Prince Edward Jackson and Brian Craig Herd
Defendant:
Sara Faye Inight, FNU Society, Marcus Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2016cv01132
Plaintiff:
John Anderson , Rusty Beltinck , Sharon Bryant and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Corporation, Bayer AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prince v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00334
Movant:
Alfred James Prince
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Prince v. Dollar Tree Stores Inc
as 5:2015cv01247
Plaintiff:
Sonja Prince
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
