Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Carter v. Hauf et al
as 5:2017cv00743
Plaintiff:
Merrill DeJohn Carter
Defendant:
R B Hauf, Payne County Detention Center, Tony Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tansimore v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2015cv01255
Plaintiff:
James Tansimore
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Judge Corley, Laura Austin Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2015cv01256
Plaintiff:
Herbert R Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Phillip Corley, Sarah Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominguez v. Hauf et al
as 5:2015cv00700
Plaintiff:
Ricky G Dominguez
Defendant:
R B Hauf and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Moynihan et al
as 5:2013cv01065
Plaintiff:
Steven Bryan Miller and Christina Faith Miller
Defendant:
Brian T Moynihan , M Cameron Allen , Charles H Noski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prather v. Hauf
as 5:2012cv01303
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
R B Hauf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Hauf et al
as 5:2012cv01183
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
R B Hauf and Payne County Security Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Hauf
as 5:2012cv01147
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
R B Hauf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Thomas et al
as 5:2012cv00945
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Katherine E Thomas, Phillip Corley, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
duBois et al v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc et al
as 5:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
Ron duBois and Thora duBois
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc , Payne County Board of County Commissioners , R B Hauf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
