Cases 1 - 10 of 323,559
Little et al v. Farmers Insurance Group d/b/a Economy Preferred Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv01950
Plaintiff:
Sharon Little and Scott Little
Defendant:
FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP doing business as ECONOMY PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
GARCIA et al v. POLYMER80, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
HECTOR GARCIA and ROSEANN MORRISON
Defendant:
POLYMER80, INC., MARCUS BURNEY, JOHN DOE(S) FIREARM SELLER(S) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
COLE v. LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01951
Plaintiff:
MIRANDA COLE
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WATKINS v. SUPERINTENDENT RIVELLO et al
as 5:2024cv01942
Petitioner:
LEWIS T. WATKINS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT RIVELLO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CASTRO v. POLYGLASS USA INC.
as 2:2024cv01944
Plaintiff:
JANILKA CASTRO
Defendant:
POLYGLASS USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
COHEN et al v. CITRENBAUM-PERKINS
as 2:2024cv01926
Plaintiff:
LENARD COHEN and LAUREN COHEN
Defendant:
REBECCA CITRENBAUM-PERKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
