Cases 11 - 20 of 21
QUICK v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03698
Petitioner:
G. HEATH QUICK
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HEATH v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2012cv07194
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HEATH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BATTS et al v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2012cv06717
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT A. BATTS, CHAL KENNEDY, MICHAEL MCCRAY and others
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEATH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv00895
Petitioner:
PAUL Q. HEATH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PATRICK F. DUGAN and WARDEN OF HOUSE OF CORRECTION PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HEATH v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HEATH
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEATH v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv03715
Plaintiff:
DAVID HEATH
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER and DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEATH v. CAHILL et al
as 2:2008cv01763
Petitioner:
DARRELL M. HEATH
Respondent:
MICHAEL CAHILL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HEATH v. SMEAL
as 2:2008cv01385
Petitioner:
DARRELL HEATH
Respondent:
PAUL K. SMEAL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HEATH v. CAHILL et al
as 2:2007cv04817
Petitioner:
DARRELL M. HEATH
Respondent:
MICHAEL CAHILL, THE UNKNOWN COMPLAINANT and DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. HEATH
as 2:2007cv03013
Petitioner:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent:
DARRELL HEATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
