Cases 1 - 10 of 26
IN RE: TUNSIL
as 2:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NUNEZ v. FISHER et al
as 5:2021cv02343
Defendant:
DERRICK FISHER, PATRICK BARRETT, JEREMY SCHOENOR and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ENRIQUE NUNEZ, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUNSIL v. COMMON PLEAS COURT/PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv02050
Petitioner:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Respondent:
JUDGE BRIGHT, COMMON PLEAS COURT/PHILADELPHIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STANTON v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SCHUYLKILL et al
as 2:2020cv06556
Respondent:
LIEU, M. KLOBE, LIEUTENANT KENNEY and others
Petitioner:
LEON STANTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIGGS v. BATIHK et al
as 5:2020cv00438
Defendant:
ROBERT HAWKE, JONATHAN G. ROTH, ELIAS M. BATIHK and others
Plaintiff:
BARRETT Q. GRIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON et al v. DELBALSO et al
as 5:2019cv05205
Respondent:
TERESA DELBALSO, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHARPIRO and others
Petitioner:
LEROY A. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Barrett et al
as 5:2019cv04922
Defendant:
BCJS, THE COUNTY OF BERKS, Berks Sheriffs Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Bailey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. CAVALLO et al
as 5:2019cv01005
Defendant:
AMBER MOLL, UPTOWN TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, RDG PA, OFFICER MATTHEW CAVALLO and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARRETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00385
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BARRETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03057
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
