Cases 21 - 30 of 42
GRAHAM v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00647
Plaintiff:
CARLYLE GRAHAM
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LICIARDELLO , BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRAHAM v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv01496
Plaintiff:
EARL GRAHAM
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL SCHAUFFLER and MICHAEL J. CURRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCKENNA v. MIGNELLA et al
as 5:2016cv01017
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW D. MCKENNA
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. MIGNELLA, MICHAEL SHALE, TIMOTHY VANHISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. SCUFFY et al
as 2:2015cv06046
Plaintiff:
RONALD GRAHAM
Defendant:
STEPPEN SCUFFY, MIKE, LOVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAXLEY v. STEVENS et al
as 2:2015cv05704
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BAXLEY
Defendant:
GREG STEVENS, CARLOS BUITRAGO, REGINALD GRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. GUZMAN et al
as 2:2015cv05208
Plaintiff:
RONALD GRAHAM
Defendant:
ANA GUZMAN, CYNTHIA PACE, BULGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THE ESTATE OF WALTER L. GRAHAM et al v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv05004
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF WALTER L. GRAHAM and BEVERLY E. GRAHAM
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES RAMSEY, ROBIN WIMBERLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYER v. GRAHAM et al
as 2:2015cv01073
Plaintiff:
ANDRE BOYER
Defendant:
WURLIN GRAHAM and ANGEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS v. MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN et al
as 2:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL REYNOLDS
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN , RUSSELL J. BONO , CHARLES DOUGLASS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOWERS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv06356
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FLOWERS , JUDAH WILLIAMS , BRADY FLOYD and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
