Cases 51 - 60 of 127
BOGGS v. HANDWERK et al
as 2:2016cv03022
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BOGGS
Defendant:
HANDWERK, GREGORY, FAIRCHILD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHOATZ v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2016cv03021
Plaintiff:
MAURICE SHOATZ
Defendant:
MICHELLE FARRELL, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10, CYNTHIA LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEHRET et al v. TRACHTA et al
as 5:2016cv02175
Plaintiff:
TREVOR GEHRET , JEREMY PETERS and DANIEL LOGOTHETIS
Defendant:
THOMAS TRACHTA, DANIEL TROXELL, CARL STYRE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONCEPCION v. TEAGUE et al
as 5:2016cv01712
Plaintiff:
NIEVES R. CONCEPCION
Defendant:
ZERICK TEAGUE, ZEEVA JACKSON, DAUPHIN COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAUNDERS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv01298
Plaintiff:
SENYA SAUNDERS and NEIYA RAWLERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GIBBONS v. MONTGOMERTY COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv01233
Plaintiff:
JOHN GIBBONS
Defendant:
MONTGOMERTY COUNTY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JULIO ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HART v. HOPPER et al
as 2:2015cv05439
Plaintiff:
GARRETT E. HART
Defendant:
MARY MCFALL HOPPER, DELAWARE COUNTY DEPUTIES JOHN/JANE DOE 1-99, CITY OF CHESTER, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HECKMAN v. AMMARY et al
as 5:2015cv04184
Plaintiff:
ELI HECKMAN
Defendant:
JASON A. AMMARY , JOHN/JANE DOES #1-X and CITY OF ALLENTOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTODOMINGO-ROSADO v. LAXTON et al
as 5:2015cv04033
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SANTODOMINGO-ROSADO
Defendant:
MATTHEW LAXTON, BLAKE KUNTZ, ANTHONY C. LEARDI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AKUBU v. WISEBACK et al
as 2:2015cv03399
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN AKUBU
Defendant:
WISEBACK, TRACY GRANT-PRATT, TYREE HOLMES-IRVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
