Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GLOVER v. OUTLAW et al
as 2:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. GLOVER
Defendant:
DANIEL OUTLAW, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICE MOFFA NICHOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AUTRY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv01501
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY AUTRY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, WARDEN PIERRE LACOMBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOPEZ v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2019cv05104
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER and DETECTIVE NICHOLS
Plaintiff:
JESSICA LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NICHOLS v. RUCH et al
as 2:2019cv00617
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, RYAN DEL RICCI and ERIC RUCH, JR.
Plaintiff:
TYLER NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYNUM v. TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv01466
Plaintiff:
BRANDON BYNUM
Defendant:
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA , NICHOLE MICHEL , CHARLES RITTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. CONCEPCION-NIEVES et al
as 2:2012cv04404
Plaintiff:
JOE LAMONT THOMPSON
Defendant:
RAPHAEL CONCEPCION-NIEVES, COREY MOORE, RAYMOND LACEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLS v. COATESVILLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2012cv01495
Plaintiff:
PAMELA NICHOLS
Defendant:
COATESVILLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NICHOLS v. COATESVILLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2010cv04303
Plaintiff:
PAMELA NICHOLS
Defendant:
COATESVILLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT , JOHN REID and RICHARD COMO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv01336
Plaintiff:
LANCE NICHOLS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NICHOLS v. CITY OF WILMINGTON et al
as 2:2008cv02782
Plaintiff:
DAMEN NICHOLS
Defendant:
CITY OF WILMINGTON and PUBLIC WORK
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
