Cases 61 - 70 of 761
NOLE v. STATE PAROLE BOARD OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2021cv00630
Respondent:
STATE PAROLE BOARD OF PHILA., TED JOHNSON, The District Attorney of the County of: Philadelphia and others
Plaintiff:
John Nole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitefield v. WETZEL
as 2:2021cv00340
Defendant:
LAWRENCE KRASNER and JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
Alfred Whitefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VENERI, JR. v. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 2:2021cv00304
Respondent:
THE HONORABLE J. AMOROSO, LAUREL HIGHLANDS, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JOHN VENERI and ANTHONY JOHN VENERI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VENERI v. HAINSWORTH et al
as 2:2021cv00573
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JOHN VENERI, JR.
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and MELISSA HAINSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VENERI v. DELAWARE COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al
as 2:2021cv00070
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE HONORABLE MARGRET J. AMOROSO, DELAWARE COUNTY COURTHOUSE and others
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JOHN VENERI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCULLOUGH v. WETZEL
as 2:2021cv00091
Petitioner:
ANTON MCCULLOUGH
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VENERI v. HAINSWORTH et al
as 2:2021cv00647
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JOHN VENERI, JR.
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR PENNSYLVANIA and MELISSA HAINSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAZULIS v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE, et al.
as 2:2021cv00003
Respondent:
Secretary of Correct JOHN WETZEL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Petitioner:
FRANK J. GRAZULIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BUTLER v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2020cv06438
Respondent:
BONSHOK and BRADLEY
Petitioner:
JOHN D. BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Culbert v. KRASNER et al
as 2:2020cv06396
Respondent:
SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL and LAWRENCE KRASNER
Petitioner:
Stacey Culbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
