Cases 1 - 10 of 87
TREADWAY, JR. v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv01583
Petitioner:
PETER ALLAN TREADWAY, JR.
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL and WEST CHESTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FELTON v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2022cv01014
Petitioner:
STEVEN FELTON
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RILEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05360
Petitioner:
NATHAN RILEY
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COULSTON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05218
Petitioner:
TROY COULSTON
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, BARRY SMITH and LAWRENCE KRASNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NOBBLEN v. BRITTIAN et al
as 2:2021cv04726
Petitioner:
WILLIAM NOBBLEN
Respondent:
SUPT. KATHY BRITTIAN, SEC. JOHN WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BEYERS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv03393
Petitioner:
AMY BEYERS
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RYAK v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv02184
Petitioner:
DEVIN RYAK
Respondent:
LAWRENCE KRASNER and JOHN WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NECHAB v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01292
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
MOURAD NECHAB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitefield v. WETZEL
as 2:2021cv00340
Defendant:
LAWRENCE KRASNER and JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
Alfred Whitefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCULLOUGH v. WETZEL
as 2:2021cv00091
Petitioner:
ANTON MCCULLOUGH
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
