Cases 11 - 20 of 42
SCHURAWLOW v. KELLY et al
as 5:2020cv04419
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN E. SCHURAWLOW
Defendant:
TROOPER(S) MATTHEW KELLY, JOHN DOE #3, RAYMOND SCHERMERHORN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. COUNTY INVESTIGATING OFFICER JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2020cv00613
Respondent:
CORRECTIONAL SGT JOHN DOE #2, GEO GROUP, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CLARK and others
Petitioner:
WILLIAM EDWARD WRIGHT, 3RD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILLINS v. NOTHSTEIN
as 5:2019cv05791
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 2, JASON NOTHSTEIN, JOHN DOE 4 and others
Plaintiff:
CORY GILLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASSAQUOI v. CO1. JOHN DOE 1 (ILLER) et al
as 2:2019cv05329
Plaintiff:
MANNA MASSAQUOI
Defendant:
CO3. JOHN DOE 3 (BROWN), CO2. PAMELA SELLERS, CO5. GINA CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2019cv04801
Defendant:
TOM ROWLANDS, TRISH KELLEY, ANGELINA MURRAY and others
Plaintiff:
EMMETT COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNETT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04754
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 1, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 3, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER CAPTAIN JOHN DOE 11 and others
Plaintiff:
TYRICO BARNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. GANTMAN et al
as 5:2019cv02581
Defendant:
MARY P. MURRAY, ALICE BECK DUBOW, JANE DOE 1 and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIREY v. EMERY et al
as 5:2019cv00535
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #2, NEIL EMERY, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SHIREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLAH v. O'CONNER et al
as 2:2018cv04048
Defendant:
SUPERVISOR JANE DOE #1, DIRECTOR JOHN DOE #1, SUPERVISOR MR. COX and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL M. ALLAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2018cv00491
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JONES
Defendant:
JEWELL WILLIAMS, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SHERIFF JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
