Cases 71 - 80 of 274
VEASY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv05107
Defendant:
FRANK JASTRZEMBSKI, MANUEL SANTIAGO, JOHN DOE(S) and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE VEASY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HENRY v. ROSATI et al
as 2:2020cv05115
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, NATHANEIL SMITH, JR., JOHN DOE #3 and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNamara v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv04570
Defendant:
Gerald Slory, ELIZABETH BRADLEY, CORIZON HEALTH and others
Plaintiff:
Eileen McNamara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merlino v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv04579
Defendant:
MEDICAL JOHN DOES, CORIZON HEALTH INC, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Michele Merlino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAUNDERS v. BB&T BANK et al
as 2:2020cv04530
Defendant:
BB&T BANK, BRANCH BANKING & TRUST, MAGISTRATE JUDGE NICHOLAS ENGLESSON and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHURAWLOW v. KELLY et al
as 5:2020cv04419
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN E. SCHURAWLOW
Defendant:
TROOPER(S) MATTHEW KELLY, JOHN DOE #3, RAYMOND SCHERMERHORN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03824
Plaintiff:
SEAN MILLS
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER FAGAN, POLICE OFFICER SANTIAGO, POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARIS v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2020cv03700
Defendant:
MARIROSA LAMAS, SARGENT (JOHN DOE), C O. ORTIZ and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. PARIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERDUE v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2020cv03422
Defendant:
Delaware County Department of Corrections, DR. SIDDHARTH SAGREIYA, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Perdue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
APONTE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03373
Plaintiff:
MELVIN APONTE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOES I-VIII
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
