Cases 1 - 10 of 18
In v. Birch
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
John In
Defendant:
Police Officer Roger Birch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MARTINEZ v. BEST et al
as 2:2023cv02114
Plaintiff:
WILFREDO MARTINEZ
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER NICOLE BEST, CORRECTIONS OFFICER WILLS, HEARING EXAMINER I. YODIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
TALLEY et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv02328
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY, PENNSYLVANIANS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS and MINORITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv02057
Defendant:
MICHAEL BURKE, MANUEL SANTIAGO, THE ESTATE OF CHARLES PERMINT and others
Plaintiff:
THEOPHALIS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
OSORIO v. ROGER et al
as 5:2019cv00041
Defendant:
STEVE NEWMAN, M. NAFF, S. GASS and others
Plaintiff:
WILSON ALBERT OSORIO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACOBS v. KING et al
as 2:2018cv05415
Defendant:
RICHARD CARROLL and ROGER KING
Plaintiff:
EUGENE JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SERRANO-MUNOZ v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2018cv04983
Defendant:
TPR SHEARN, TPR HOLDEMAN, TPR ROGERS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID SERRANO-MUNOZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS-BEY v. WOLFF et al
as 2:2016cv03685
Plaintiff:
TYRONE LEWIS-BEY
Defendant:
TOM WOLFF, PA SUPERIOR COURT, JIM KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv00128
Plaintiff:
ROGER T. EDWARDS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DEFENDER'S ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MCGARRIGLE et al
as 2:2014cv04757
Plaintiff:
VINCENT THOMAS
Defendant:
TOM MCGARRIGLE, MARIO J. CIVERA, JR., COLLEEN P. MORRONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
