Cases 11 - 20 of 25
DEWS v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv03048
Plaintiff:
EUGENE GREGORY DEWS
Defendant:
JOE KORSNIAK, JOSE BOGGIO, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAXWELL v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv02929
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MAXWELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and M. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv01174
Plaintiff:
IVAN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2013cv01077
Plaintiff:
EUGENE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARNETT v. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE CAMP-HILL
as 2:2012cv07083
Plaintiff:
TYRONE EUGENE GARNETT
Defendant:
STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE CAMP-HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FUGARINO v. BRENNAN
as 2:2012cv01277
Plaintiff:
EUGENE FUGARINO, SR.
Defendant:
JAMES BRENNAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPEAKES v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv06728
Plaintiff:
EUGENE J. SPEAKES, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. PHILADELPHIA PRISONS et al
as 2:2011cv06529
Plaintiff:
TIM EUGENE JONES
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISONS and CFCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKERSON v. CURRAN FROM-HOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2011cv05940
Plaintiff:
EUGENE DICKERSON
Defendant:
CURRAN FROM-HOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CEASAR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv04660
Plaintiff:
EUGENE CEASAR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
