Cases 1 - 10 of 10
IRIZARRY v. S.C.I. PHOENIX et al
as 2:2021cv04630
Petitioner:
D. JOEL IRIZARRY
Respondent:
S.C.I. PHOENIX and C.O. NORMA TILSON-PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORGIONE v. SCI GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2019cv02189
Defendant:
MR. SEGT. PIERCE, SCI GRATERFORD, MR. KELLY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FORGIONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. REILEY et al
as 2:2017cv04034
Plaintiff:
DAVID MURPHY, JOHN BELLEGUE, JEROME BERRY and others
Defendant:
REILEY, A. SZEKELY, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KUZAN v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM/C.F.C.F et al
as 2:2017cv01370
Plaintiff:
PAUL WILLIAM KUZAN
Defendant:
MRS. HENDERSON (CFCF), MRS. TULLER (PICC), MRS. PIERCE (PICC) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MUNSON v. BELLO et al
as 2:2013cv04267
Plaintiff:
PAUL MUNSON
Defendant:
BELLO, MAY, THE CFCF CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ON STATE RD. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUNSON v. THE CFCF COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2013cv04268
Plaintiff:
PAUL MUNSON
Defendant:
THE CFCF COUNTY PRISON, KAREN, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. GEORGE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2010cv05090
Plaintiff:
DARREN JOSEPH ARNOLD
Defendant:
GEORGE HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, FRANK GREEN, E. ASANTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERCE v. CFCF
as 2:2010cv04286
Plaintiff:
TYHEE PIERCE
Defendant:
CFCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMAN v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2010cv03920
Plaintiff:
TERRON HOLMAN
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHNSON, FLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. C.F.C.F. PHILADELPHIA-PRISON-SYSTEM
as 2:2010cv03081
Plaintiff:
HASAN PIERCE
Defendant:
C.F.C.F. PHILADELPHIA-PRISON-SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
