Prison Condition Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
BELL v. SORBER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00825
Plaintiff: JOSEPH BELL
Defendant: K. SORBER, J.P. LUTHER and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. FARRELL
as 2:2019cv01995
Plaintiff: QUARI BELL
Defendant: R. FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2017cv03239
Plaintiff: KYLIEFF BROWN
Defendant: THOMAS MCGINLEY, EDWARD BAUMBACH, ANTHONY LUSCAVAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv05574
Plaintiff: CARLSON F. ANDERSON
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL BELL, CYNITHIA LINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. CFCF CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2015cv06184
Plaintiff: WALTER RICHARDSON
Defendant: CFCF CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, BELL, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACOBSEN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv03372
Plaintiff: ROBERT N. JACOBSEN
Defendant: MICHALE NUTTER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACOBSEN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv01812
Plaintiff: ROBERT N. JACOBSEN
Defendant: MICHALE NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, MACHAILE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL v. DAY
as 2:2015cv00212
Plaintiff: KHALIL BELL
Defendant: J. DAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. LINDSAY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv03406
Plaintiff: NATHANIEL BELL
Defendant: CAMERON LINDSAY, DAVE BRYNE, NATALIE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. GRAY et al
as 2:2014cv01150
Plaintiff: DARRELL BELL
Defendant: GRAY, REYNOLDS, KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?