Cases 21 - 30 of 163
PEQUENO v. ZITZKI
as 5:2021cv04455
Plaintiff:
JOHN PEQUENO
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZITZKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TEST DOE v. ABC CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv99999
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLFORD v. DIFABIO et al
as 2:2021cv02261
Plaintiff:
BROOKE E. HOLFORD
Defendant:
LORI DIFABIO, LORI A. DIFABIO, DANIEL C. DIAZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NARAYANAN et al v. HANSGROHE, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00828
Defendant:
HANSGROHE, INC., SHERLE WAGNER INTERNATIONAL LLC, JOHN DOE 1-4 and others
Plaintiff:
VIJAY NARAYANAN and SUSHMA RAJAGOPALAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
BOSKIE v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY
as 2:2021cv00592
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDWARD BOSKIE, JR.
Defendant:
DREXEL UNIVERSITY doing business as DREXEL MEDICINE
VINCO VENTURES, INC. et al v. MILAM KNECHT & WARNER, LLP et al
as 5:2020cv06577
Plaintiff:
VINCO VENTURES, INC., PHILLIP MCFILLIN, KEVIN FERGUSON and others
Defendant:
TIFFANY W. TAI, DAVID KNECHT, REX OURS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VINCO VENTURES, INC. et al v. MILAM KNECHT & WARNER, LLP et al
as 2:2020cv06577
Plaintiff:
VINCO VENTURES, INC., PHILLIP MCFILLIN, KEVIN FERGUSON and others
Defendant:
TIFFANY W. TAI, DAVID KNECHT, REX OURS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
QUEZADA, et al. v. ARBITERSPORTS, LLC
as 2:2020cv05193
Plaintiff:
VICTOR RODRIGUEZ QUEZADA, BRENDAN MONAGHAN, VICTOR ALFONSO RODRIGUEZ QUEZADA and others
Defendant:
ARBITERSPORTS, LLC
Petitioner:
MAURICE HARGROVE
WEBSTER v. INTERMATIC, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04586
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-4 and INTERMATIC, INC.
Plaintiff:
PAUL AND MARIE WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMPUS DOOR HOLDINGS INC. v. SIXUP LENDING LLC et al
as 2:2020cv03763
Defendant:
AUGUSTINE BUI, RICHARD YANG, JOHN DOES 1-15 and others
Plaintiff:
CAMPUS DOOR HOLDINGS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
