Cases 91 - 100 of 176
BRETT v. RUFFIN et al
as 2:2014cv04445
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
PHYLLIS RUFFIN, ERIKA UNKNOWN, CRYSTAL UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADFORD v. WALKER et al
as 2:2014cv02256
Plaintiff:
SAMMIE BRADFORD
Defendant:
JEFFREY WALKER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JOHN DOE BADGE NO. UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLERBE v. MEMEGER et al
as 2:2014cv01919
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Defendant:
D. ZANE MEMEGER, SPECIAL AGENT-IN-CHARGE OF THE FBI, MICHAEL KUNZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TONKINSON v. GOLDSCHMIDT et al
as 2:2014cv00737
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY TONKINSON
Defendant:
MATTHEW GOLDSCHMIDT, VICTOR HENNIS, PAUL BATINIERI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
F. v. PRESSLEY SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF et al
as 5:2014cv00335
Plaintiff:
AKIL ABASI F.
Defendant:
PRESSLEY SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF, PRESSLEY RIDGE, THE PRESSLEY RIDGE SCHOOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
BRETT v. UNKNOWN
as 2:2013cv07549
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
ERICA UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. U.S. MARSHALL STEVE UNKNOWN et al
as 2:2013cv07234
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALL STEVE UNKNOWN, U.S. HOMELAND SECURITY, GREG H. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASON v. KRUCZAJ et al
as 2:2013cv06512
Plaintiff:
DWAUNE MASON
Defendant:
NICHOLAS KRUCZAJ , UNKNOWN OFFICERS and THE CITY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASSELLI et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv06279
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS CASSELLI and LAWRENCE LOVE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, GREGORY HOLMAN, STEPHEN REEDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WIGO v. COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05657
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WIGO
Defendant:
COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS, INC., JEROME FIORDIMONDO, DON BEESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
