Cases 91 - 100 of 136
BOLDEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv00467
Plaintiff:
MARY BELINDA BOLDEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE BUREAU OF PRISONS IN PENNA., JEROME STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DELTITO, et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al
as 2:2010cv06787
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DELTITO and MARCELLA GRINGERI
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , TIMOTHY BOGAN , ANTHONY COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE, CAPITAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv05538
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH JEAN YOUNG
Defendant:
ASSET ACCEPTANCE, CAPITAL CORPORATION, JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HEFLEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv03896
Plaintiff:
GARY B. HEFLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2010cv02926
Plaintiff:
ANTWANA MURPHY
Defendant:
DAVID YOUNG , GARY DANCE and JAMES HEINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
COVINGTON v. YOUNG SCHOLARS CHARTER SCHOOL
as 2:2010cv00278
Plaintiff:
TRICHITA COVINGTON
Defendant:
YOUNG SCHOLARS CHARTER SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HONEY BROOK ESTATES, LLC v. HONEY BROOK TOWNSHIP, et al
as 2:2009cv06190
Defendant:
HONEY BROOK TOWNSHIP, HONEY BROOK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, HONEY BROOK TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION and others
Plaintiff:
HONEY BROOK ESTATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
