Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv04153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HALL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv06567
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL HALL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, AGNES BROOKINS, FELICIA MASSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ADAMS et al v. US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05603
Plaintiff:
SHARNAE ADAMS , BEVERLY ADAMS , TAMEKA ADAMS and others
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. and US AIRWAYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MESSENGER v. MAXEY et al
as 5:2010cv04940
Plaintiff:
MARC C. MESSENGER
Defendant:
PAUL E. MAXEY , TAMARA TWARDOWSKI and LOWER FREDERICK TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLST et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv04994
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE HOLST and TAMARA AKSUNGUR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, GARY L. WHEELER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
MARCOLONGO et al v. CUJDIK et al
as 2:2009cv03554
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MARCOLONGO, JOSEPH MARCOLONGO, TAMARA MARCOLONGO and others
Defendant:
JEFFREY CUJDIK, ROBERT MCDONNELL, JOSEPH BOLOGNA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
