Cases 21 - 30 of 433
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Srvs. Employment & Reemployment Rights Act
Adams et al v. Adelphoi USA
as 2:2023cv03684
Plaintiff:
Jahmir Adams, Jeremy Lee Hensel, Danny Jesus Ruiz and others
Defendant:
Adelphoi USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams et al v. Adelphoi USA
as 5:2023cv03684
Plaintiff:
Jahmir Adams, Jeremy Lee Hensel, Danny Jesus Ruiz and others
Defendant:
Adelphoi USA and John/Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PALAMAR v. CLIFFORD et al
as 2:2023cv03552
Plaintiff:
KEILA PALAMAR
Defendant:
DANIEL J. CLIFFORD, III, CAROLYN T. CARLUCCIO and MONTGOMERY COUNTY PA.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOOLD et al v. OPERA et al
as 2:2023cv03527
Plaintiff:
SHERRY ANN GOOLD and BRADFORD E. WILSON
Defendant:
DANIEL OPERA, MARY ROSE OPERA, UPPER SOUTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANTIAGO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv03317
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROSARIO SANTIAGO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
