Cases 21 - 30 of 65
DUGLAS v. WOMEN OF HOPE et al
as 2:2015cv06654
Plaintiff:
LOLITA DUGLAS
Defendant:
WOMEN OF HOPE, THE CITY, ROE CHETALO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. KERRY et al
as 2:2015cv05983
Plaintiff:
DAVID SCOTT
Defendant:
JOHN F. KERRY , JOHN DOE, JANE ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
AKUBU v. WISEBACK et al
as 2:2015cv03399
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN AKUBU
Defendant:
WISEBACK, TRACY GRANT-PRATT, TYREE HOLMES-IRVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TARNOSKI v. COUNTY OF BERKS et al
as 5:2015cv02000
Plaintiff:
ERIKA TARNOSKI and MICHAEL TOBIAS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BERKS , PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POSES et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv01213
Plaintiff:
ILENE POSES , LISA HAVER and BARBARA DOWDALL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , OFFICER JOHN DOE(S), SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv01052
Plaintiff:
MARK J. CARTER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , ROLAND M. BUTLER , MAMMOUA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE et al v. SOUTHEAST DELCO SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2015cv00901
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE , JANE DOE , WILLIAM ROE and others
Defendant:
SOUTHEAST DELCO SCHOOL DISTRICT , STEPHEN D. BUTZ , JEFFREY RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHNEE v. BERKS COUNTY et al
as 5:2014cv03195
Plaintiff:
DIANE M. SCHNEE
Defendant:
BERKS COUNTY , JOHN DOE(S), PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COATES v. HAGANS et al
as 2:2013cv05946
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH COATES
Defendant:
THEODORE HAGANS, TRAVIS, LING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERS v. BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv05517
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA ANDERS
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY, TERRANCE P. MOORE, DAVID DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
