Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CRUZ-SMITH v. SINCLAIR et al
as 5:2010cv03609
Plaintiff:
VANESSA CRUZ-SMITH
Defendant:
MICHAEL SINCLAIR, THOMAS TRACHTA, FREDERICK LAHOVSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CRUZ v. TOWNSHIP OF BETHLEHEM et al
as 5:2010cv00606
Plaintiff:
CARMEN CRUZ
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF BETHLEHEM, LEONARD SHEPULSKI, DAN PANCOAST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv05494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 (e)(2) Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MARQUEZ v. CUJDIK et al
as 2:2009cv04401
Plaintiff:
CESAR MARQUEZ and CESAR MARQUEZ
Defendant:
JEFFREY CUJDIK, MARIO CRUZ and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANTANA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv04121
Plaintiff:
JOSE SANTANA
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY CUJDIK, MARIO CRUZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
