Cases 41 - 50 of 53
AP AUTO PARTS AND SERVICE CENTER, INC. et al v. JOHN DOES 1-10 et al
as 2:2012cv06217
Plaintiff:
AP AUTO PARTS AND SERVICE CENTER, INC. , ERENILDA MERCEDES ROJAS-PEREZ , LUGI LUNA and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOE and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARRASQUILLO v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2012cv01844
Plaintiff:
JOSE CARRASQUILLO
Defendant:
EDGARDO PEREZ, RONALD BUBAS, DANIELLE LYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MULLINS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv01713
Plaintiff:
JOAN MULLINS and JANELLE PIERSALL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ALBONDOZ, FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEREZ v. LANCASTER CITY et al
as 5:2012cv01472
Plaintiff:
BERNADETTE PEREZ
Defendant:
LANCASTER CITY , LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE , BRADLEY SHENK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JOHNSON v. THE US ATTORNEY'S et al
as 2:2010cv01643
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JOHNSON
Defendant:
THE US ATTORNEY'S, PATRICK MEHANN, TONY WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS MICHAEL DUGAL et al
as 2:2010cv00572
Plaintiff:
VICTOR PEREZ
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS MICHAEL DUGAL, CARRETE and HEFLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLZWORTH v. MOORE
as 2:2009cv05085
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HOLZWORTH
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TERRANCE MOORE, JEFFREY TOMLINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2009cv04298
Plaintiff:
YAHAIRA PEREZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
