Cases 61 - 70 of 180
FROMPOVICZ v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROCTION et al
as 5:2017cv02790
Plaintiff:
STANLEY F. FROMPOVICZ, JR.
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , DAVID HISSNER , LISA DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
ELLERBE v. THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2017cv01473
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Defendant:
THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA, ROBERT A. BRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOPISHKE et al v. WAYDA et al
as 5:2017cv01265
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KOPISHKE and DIANE KOPISHKE
Defendant:
PETER WAYDA, WALNUTPORT BOROUGH, DAVID ALERCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HARRIS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00567
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT HARRIS and ARMONTI WOMACK
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , NICHOLAS CARRELLI , PETER PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
MOORE v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ANTHONY MOORE
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER, BOROUGH OF EPHRATA, PETER G. SHEPPARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLAS v. BARBEY et al
as 5:2016cv06623
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JAMES NICHOLAS
Defendant:
PETER D. BARBEY, READING EAGLE NEWSPAPER and STEVEN HENSHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
