Cases 71 - 79 of 79
CAMPBELL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv04346
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA CAMPBELL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN HANGCHUCHO and JOHN DOE #1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
HOWARD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv03146
Plaintiff:
HANIF HOWARD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DE'ANGELO, PAUL SPRIGG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
JOHNS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv05314
Plaintiff:
TERRELL JOHNS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAMES PITTS, KEVIN JUDGE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FORD et al v. BUCKWALTER et al
as 2:2008cv05322
Plaintiff:
ADONIS FORD, DIARRA MAYO, NATHANIEL FORD and others
Defendant:
DARRIN BUCKWALTER, MUNICIPALITY OF NORRISTOWN and JOHN DOE #1-5
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ANDERSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv01357
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ERIC ANDERSON and ALFRED ERIC ANDERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MARIO DELUCA, ABC, INC. (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWELL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2007cv01806
Plaintiff:
ANNE-MARIE POWELL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LEON KING, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MANELSKI et al v. TINICUM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2007cv01487
Plaintiff:
DENISE MANELSKI, DENISE MANELSKI, DENISE MANELSKI and others
Defendant:
TINICUM TOWNSHIP, TINICUM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, PETER J. BILLBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
S.B. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2007cv00768
Plaintiff:
S. B.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CHERYL RANSOM-GARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
