Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03078
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SEIGEL v. ARIA HEALTH
as 2:2018cv05550
Defendant:
ARIA HEALTH, XYZ CORPS. 1-10 and JOHN AND JANE DOES (1-10)
Plaintiff:
CARLTON SEIGEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04446
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CARLTON WILLIAMS and LOUIS GIORLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNETT et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE RISK MANAGEMENT DIVISION CLAIMS UNIT et al
as 2:2014cv04146
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN T. BARNETT, GWENDOLYN BARNETT and S.T. BARNETT
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTION OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER CARLTON WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLES et al v. RITZ CARLTON RESIDENCE et al
as 2:2013cv01461
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY COLES and MACAUEL CASINO
Defendant:
RITZ CARLTON RESIDENCE and RESIDENCE CONDOMINIUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
GIBSON v. ROBINSON et al
as 2:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
CARLTON GIBSON
Defendant:
CARL ROBINSON, JR., JOHN DOE #1-4 and BOROUGH OF NORRISTOWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
