Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KENNEDY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2021cv04667
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THOMAS W. WOLF, JOSUA D. SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00497
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06026
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCKIE v. PHILADELPHIA CI AND FBI INFORMANTS et al
as 2:2018cv01805
Plaintiff:
CRYSTALEAN MCKIE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA CI AND FBI INFORMANTS, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CASEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DELGADO v. SOTO-FIGUEROA et al
as 5:2017cv01041
Plaintiff:
NATHAN DELGADO
Defendant:
COLILE MARIE SOTO-FIGUEROA, EMMANUEL ALEXIS MORALES-VAZQUEZ, MICHAEL E. MCHALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
K.W. et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2016cv05578
Plaintiff:
K.W. , DELORES WHITE and WILLIAM A. LOVE
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY , RONNIE MCGILL , PASQUALE T. DEON, SR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
