Cases 1 - 10 of 106
HOFFMAN v. BAILEY
as 2:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
SARAH ANN HOFFMAN
Defendant:
DR. BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TUTORA v. FAREED et al
as 2:2024cv01923
Plaintiff:
TOLEKSIS BIIN TUTORA, SR.
Defendant:
DR. FAREED and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, THE BUDD COMPANY, DR. MESHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. COWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
DEAN MCKENZIE
Defendant:
DR. KAYON AYTON COWELL, BEATRICE PYE and MICHAEL M. MCKENZIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOVEL v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
TAMALA KATHLEEN DOVEL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN PAUL SMEAL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE#'S 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
G.A. v. SNEAD et al
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
G.A.
Defendant:
MEG SNEAD, DR. VAL ARKOOSH, RACHEL LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Alston v. Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals et al
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Ms. Phyllis M Alston and Phyllis M Alston
Defendant:
LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER, Main Line Health, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
