Cases 1 - 10 of 25
SANTIAGO v. PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BNI AGENT JONES BADGE 659 et al
as 2:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
DAVID T. SANTIAGO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BNI AGENT JONES BADGE 659 and BNI AGENT JOHN/JANE DOE 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOSES-FARRARE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
EARLENE MOSES-FARRARE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER BERTHESI, BADGE#2090, POLICE OFFICER MARY F. KUCHINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEREZ v. BRADER et al
as 5:2022cv03718
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL A PEREZ
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT BRIAN BRADER, SERGEANT RANDY FEY, SERGEANT DAVID McDONALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
KABAKA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv06174
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JOHN/JANE DOE #1-10
Plaintiff:
KWABENA KABAKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. LEBRON et al
as 5:2020cv04331
Defendant:
OFFICER JONATHAN SMITH, CITY OF ALLENTOWN, OFFICER SCOT WALZ and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03298
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JOHN/JANE DOE #1-10
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CURRAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VELEZ v. SCHWEIZER et al
as 2:2019cv00162
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and OFFICER SCOTT SCHWEIZER
Plaintiff:
JOSE VELEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOMEZ v. CZAPOR et al
as 2:2018cv05402
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and OFFICER JONATHAN CZAPOR
Plaintiff:
FRANSICO GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
