Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04188
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
PRINCE v. DE FACTO IMPLEMATION OF LAW et al
as 2:2019cv00063
Defendant: ALL SATELLITE ORGANIZATIONS, DE FACTO IMPLEMATION OF LAW, REPUBLICAN AA NATIONAL COMMITT and others
Plaintiff: DARRELL SANFORD PRINCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00638
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02602
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv04238
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PRINCE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv03787
Plaintiff: DARRELL SANFORD PRINCE
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS and OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv05213
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Type: Civil Rights None
SOCIETY HILL CIVIC ASSOCIATION et al v. DECKER et al
as 2:2007cv04629
Plaintiff: SOCIETY HILL CIVIC ASSOCIATION, NORTHERN LIBERTIES NEIGHBORS ASSOCIATION, PENNSPORT CIVIC ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant: THOMAS A. DECKER, RAYMOND ANGELI, MARY DIGIACAMO COLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?