Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 101 - 110 of 258
DAVIS v. MCGINLEY
as 2:2016cv06272
Petitioner: TIMOTHY DAVIS
Respondent: THOMAS S. MCGINLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
SIMMONS v. FALICESANO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv05709
Plaintiff: AUGUSTUS SIMMONS
Defendant: FALICESANO, OTTINGER, COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2016cv05463
Plaintiff: CLARENCE JOHNSON
Defendant: DAVIS, PICC PRISON IN and PHILLY C.F.C.F. FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. WEST READING HOSPITAL
as 5:2016cv05130
Plaintiff: ERIC MONROE DAVIS
Defendant: WEST READING HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. FDC OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv04907
Plaintiff: GENE CORNELL SMITH
Defendant: FDC OF PHILADELPHIA, MERLAN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. MCGINLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv03807
Petitioner: OZZIE DAVIS
Respondent: THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EVANS v. MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2016cv03426
Plaintiff: JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant: MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL, TOWNE MANOR EAST NURSING HOME & REHABILITATION CENTER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2016cv03432
Plaintiff: DELACEY DAVIS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03356
Plaintiff: MAURICE T. DAVIS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02375
Petitioner: MARVIN DAVIS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?