Cases 101 - 110 of 20,736
IN RE QUINZEL KK CAIBY
as 2:2024cv01936
Plaintiff:
QUINZEL KK CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COHEN V. COMM OF PA
as 5:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
PAUL COHEN
Defendant:
COMM OF PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMBARDO v. EVANS et al
as 5:2024cv01999
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
BRANDON T. EVANS, JENNA MARIE PLISZAR, KEVIN SAMUEL SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COTTON v. MCCAFFRY
as 2:2024cv01345
Plaintiff:
DURELL H. COTTON, JR.
Defendant:
MCCAFFRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FULLMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00969
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FULLMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BRYAN TRUSH, BARBARA A. MCDERMOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
LOMBARDO V. ZANELLI, ET AL
as 5:2024cv01806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE AMY ZANELLI, ANDREW YOST, MATTHEW STEIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ALWARD v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv01894
Petitioner:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Respondent:
MDOC, WASHTENAW COUNTY and WAYNE COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALWARD v. FCI OXFORD et al
as 2:2024cv01883
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Defendant:
FCI OXFORD, LT. BROESCH and WARDEN EMMERICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOMEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2024cv01227
Defendant:
SCI CHESTER, CO3 LT. MR. POSADA, COMMONWEALTH OF PA and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIER GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLDNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOLDNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
