Cases 11 - 20 of 120
WOODELL v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv01098
Plaintiff:
RANCOURT WOODELL
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE, G. GALINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANKLIN v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI, HUNTINGDON et al
as 2:2016cv03257
Petitioner:
DELBERT FRANKLIN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI, HUNTINGDON and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RANDALL v. LANCASTER COUNTY, PA et al
as 5:2016cv02567
Plaintiff:
RAMSEY RANDALL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, PA, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, FRANKLIN COUNTY, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOLSON v. BERKS COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2015cv03391
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN B. GOLSON
Defendant:
QUIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CUTTINO v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv06990
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN CUTTINO
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHONOSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 5:2014cv04905
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN JOHONOSON
Respondent:
BRIAN H. THOMPSON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHALINE KELLY FOR PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHAW v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2014cv04755
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN SHAW
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, FERRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILEMAN v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 2:2014cv02434
Plaintiff:
GLENN J. WILEMAN
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL and FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CULVER v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2014cv01087
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN R. CULVER
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FRANKLIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv00049
Petitioner:
DARRYL L. FRANKLIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
