Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
MUNOZ v. FISHER et al
as 2:2013cv07270
Petitioner: JORGE L. MUNOZ
Respondent: JOHN D. FISHER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PREACHER v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv03554
Petitioner: JOHN D. PREACHER
Respondent: BRIAN COLEMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKER v. H.L. HUFFORD/F.C.I. SCHUYLKILL, et al.
as 5:2011cv03574
Petitioner: JOHN D. PARKER
Respondent: H.L. HUFFORD/F.C.I. SCHUYLKILL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF COUNTY OF QUEENS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BEAVER v. KURYAN et al
as 2:2011cv02684
Plaintiff: KEITH BEAVER
Defendant: JOHN D. KURYAN, DELAWARE COUNTY DA'S OFFICE, STANLEY KOVACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEAVER v. KURYAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv07482
Plaintiff: KEITH BEAVER
Defendant: JOHN D. KURYAN, CITY OF CHESTER, PA, TIFFANY PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASHFORD v. BRADY et al
as 2:2010cv00139
Plaintiff: KENNETH WINSTON ASHFORD
Defendant: SHAWN BRADY, JOHN D. BRENNEMAN, SHERIFF LEAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRINAGE v. FERN BROWN CAPLAN, ESQUIRE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv04119
Plaintiff: ROXANNE GRINAGE
Defendant: FERN BROWN CAPLAN, ESQUIRE, TIMOTHY E. POSSENTI, LISETTE SHIRDAN-HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHES v. WATERGATE et al Featured Case
as 2:2007cv05353
Plaintiff: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant: WATERGATE, GEORGE GORDON LIDDY, E. HOWARD HUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?